Core M-5Y51 vs Core i7-13700K
Core M-5Y51
Core i7-13700K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core M-5Y51 is positioned at rank #1154 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y51
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core M-5Y51 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($281) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core M-5Y51 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1484%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($281) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y51 and Core i7-13700K
Core M-5Y51
The Core M-5Y51 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,030 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y51 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y51 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 70% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core M-5Y51 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y51 scores 2,030 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 183% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y51 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Core M-5Y51 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 16 / 24+700% |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz+108% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+209% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+650% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,030 | 45,784+2155% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 31,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,980 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y51 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core M-5Y51 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core M-5Y51) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core M-5Y51 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core M-5Y51 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Core M-5Y51 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. At current prices ($281 vs $400), the Core M-5Y51 is $119 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y51 delivers 7.2 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 176.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y51 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281-31% | $409 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281-30% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 114.5+1490% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core M-5Y51 and Core i7-13700K
