
Core Solo T1300

Athlon MP 2800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Solo T1300 is positioned at rank 1240 and the Athlon MP 2800+ is on rank 1026, so the Athlon MP 2800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1300
Performance Per Dollar Athlon MP 2800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Solo T1300 | Athlon MP 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (K7 (2000−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Solo T1300 | Athlon MP 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Solo T1300 and Athlon MP 2800+

Core Solo T1300
The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Athlon MP 2800+
The Athlon MP 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 May 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 380 points. Launch price was $275.
Processing Power
Both the Core Solo T1300 and Athlon MP 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 versus 2.13 GHz on the Athlon MP 2800+ — a 24.8% clock advantage for the Athlon MP 2800+. The Core Solo T1300 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon MP 2800+ uses K7 (2000−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1300 scores 385 against the Athlon MP 2800+'s 380 — a 1.3% lead for the Core Solo T1300.
| Feature | Core Solo T1300 | Athlon MP 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.66 GHz | 2.13 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 1.66 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm-50% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Yonah (2005−2006) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| PassMark | 385+1% | 380 |
Value Analysis
The Core Solo T1300 launched at $209 MSRP, while the Athlon MP 2800+ debuted at $275. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Athlon MP 2800+ is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Solo T1300 delivers 38.5 pts/$ vs 38.0 pts/$ for the Athlon MP 2800+ — making the Core Solo T1300 the 1.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core Solo T1300 | Athlon MP 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $209-24% | $275 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.5+1% | 38.0 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2003 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















