Core Ultra 5 225F vs Core Ultra 5 235T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 225F vs Core Ultra 5 235T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 225F vs Core Ultra 5 235T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 225F

2025

Why buy it

✅+1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($231 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,653 vs 2,760).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 235T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 5 235T

2025

Why buy it

✅+4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU, while Core Ultra 5 225F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,900 vs 13,028).
❌
6.9% HIGHER MSRP
$247 MSRPvs$231 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 235T better than Core Ultra 5 225F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 235T is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225F pulls ahead with 1% better Geekbench multi-core. Core Ultra 5 235T also has the bigger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 235T is still the faster CPU overall, but Core Ultra 5 225F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 5 235T comes in 6.9% more expensive on MSRP at $247 MSRP versus $231 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core Ultra 5 225F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better Geekbench multi-core. Core Ultra 5 225F is also 5.2% better value on MSRP (136.5 vs 129.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 235T is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core Ultra 5 225F vs Core Ultra 5 235T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 225F

The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,541 points. Launch price was $231.

Core Ultra 5 235T

The Core Ultra 5 235T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,053 points. Launch price was $247.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225F packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235T offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225F versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235T — a 2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235T (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture using a 3 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 31,541 against the Core Ultra 5 235T's 32,053 — a 1.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,653 vs 2,760, a 4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,028 vs 12,900 (1% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 235T.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225F	Core Ultra 5 235T
Cores / Threads	10 / 10	14 / 14+40%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+50%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm	3 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	31,541	32,053+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,050	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,653	2,760+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,028	12,900

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1851 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225F) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 235T).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225F	Core Ultra 5 235T
Socket	LGA1851	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+33%	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core Ultra 5 225F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 235T includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU), while the Core Ultra 5 225F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235T targets Mainstream Desktop.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225F	Core Ultra 5 235T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Mainstream Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 225F was priced at $231, while the Core Ultra 5 235T came in at $247. On launch pricing ($231 vs $247), Core Ultra 5 225F was $16 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 225F delivers 136.5 pts/$ vs 129.8 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 235T — making the Core Ultra 5 225F the 5.1% better value option.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225F	Core Ultra 5 235T
MSRP	$231-6%	$247
Performance per Dollar	136.5+5%	129.8
Release Date	2025	2025

Search Core Ultra 5 225F on Amazon

Search Core Ultra 5 235T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.