Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 228V

8 / 8

16,955

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8 / 16

16,829

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $254 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 180W, a 163W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 16,955).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
❌958.8% higher power demand at 180W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 228V is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 228V is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 228V is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 228V comes in $254 cheaper on MSRP at $295 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 18.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 87.5% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 30.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 228V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 228V vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X's 16,829 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+13%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+81%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	32 MB+300%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+20380%
Process	3 nm-79%	14 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	16,955	16,829
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,932	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,585	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,053	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Socket	FCBGA2833	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5X-8533	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Arc 130V	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 228V was priced at $295, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($295 vs $549), Core Ultra 5 228V was $254 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 228V delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — making the Core Ultra 5 228V the 60.9% better value option.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP	$295-46%	$549
Performance per Dollar	57.5+87%	30.7
Release Date	2024	2017

Search Core Ultra 5 228V on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.