
Core Ultra 7 265HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 265HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.8 vs 83.4 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,417 vs 18,500).
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.4 vs 108.8 PassMark/$ ($479 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Core Ultra 7 265HX
2025Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.8 vs 83.4 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,417 vs 18,500).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.4 vs 108.8 PassMark/$ ($479 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 9800X3D better than Core Ultra 7 265HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 880 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 499 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 607 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 453 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 839 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 685 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 610 FPS | 698 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 596 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 998 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 903 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 784 FPS | 907 FPS |
| ultra | 712 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 817 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 726 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 628 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265HX and Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Core Ultra 7 265HX
Core Ultra 7 265HX
The Core Ultra 7 265HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 48,975 points. Launch price was $500.


Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 39,966 points. Launch price was $479.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265HX has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265HX versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265HX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 48,975 against the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 39,966 — a 20.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,990 vs 3,450, a 14.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,417 vs 18,500 (6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265HX vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+2% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz+81% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+220% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 48,975+23% | 39,966 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 23,277 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,990 | 3,450+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,417 | 18,500+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 7 265HX) and X670E,B650E,X870E,B850 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265HX) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 7 9800X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU (Core Ultra 7 265HX) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 9800X3D targets Extreme Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 9800X3D rivals Core i9-14900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | Extreme Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265HX launched at $450 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D debuted at $479. On MSRP ($450 vs $479), the Core Ultra 7 265HX is $29 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265HX delivers 108.8 pts/$ vs 83.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — making the Core Ultra 7 265HX the 26.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265HX | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-6% | $479 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.8+30% | 83.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












