Core Ultra 9 285H
VS
Core i7-13700E

Core Ultra 9 285H vs Core i7-13700E

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

16 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core i7-13700E

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285H

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
121%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
112%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
102%
#40
Core Ultra 9 285H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
97%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700E

#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
107%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
106%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
106%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
105%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
103%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
103%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
103%
#206
Core i3-13100E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
103%
#207
Core i9-13900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $536
103%
#208
Processor 300
MSRP: $82|Avg: $80
102%
#209
Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $145
102%
#210
Ryzen 5 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $80
102%
#211
Core i9-14900KS
MSRP: $749|Avg: $670
101%
#212
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $384
100%
#213
Core i3-8100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
100%
#214
Core i7-13700E
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
100%
#215
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
MSRP: $430|Avg: $270
100%
#216
Core i7-9700
MSRP: $333|Avg: $150
99%
#217
Core i5-13500TE
MSRP: $235|Avg: $250
99%
#218
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
MSRP: $294|Avg: $76
98%
#219
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#220
Athlon PRO 300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#221
Athlon Gold 3150G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
97%
#222
Core i7-9800X
MSRP: $589|Avg: $210
97%
#223
Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $235
96%
#224
Ryzen 9 5900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $395
96%
#225
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
MSRP: $299|Avg: $300
96%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
59%
#226
Core i5-14500T
MSRP: $232|Avg: $267
96%
#227
Core i5-12600
MSRP: $233|Avg: $250
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 9 285H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-13700E in both compute-intensive tasks (1.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Ultra 9 285HCore i7-13700E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($380)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 9 285HCore i7-13700E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($380)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285H and Core i7-13700E

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

Intel

Core i7-13700E

The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 285H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core i7-13700E's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Core i7-13700E uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285H scores 34,327 against the Core i7-13700E's 33,824 — a 1.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 26,500 vs 24,775 (6.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,720 vs 2,118, a 24.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,330 vs 14,711 (4.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HCore i7-13700E
Cores / Threads
16 / 16
16 / 24
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+6%
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+53%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+50%
2 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-70%
10 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
34,327+1%
33,824
Cinebench R23 Multi
26,500+7%
24,775
Geekbench 6 Single
2,720+28%
2,118
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,330+4%
14,711
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13700E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 9 285H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs 20 (Core i7-13700E) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H) and H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E).

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HCore i7-13700E
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+50%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28+40%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation, Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375; Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285HCore i7-13700E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Mobile Workstation
Embedded Workstation