Core Ultra 9 288V
Ryzen 9 5900X
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 105W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 140V, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,300 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌250% higher power demand at 105W vs 30W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 9 288V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 288V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Core Ultra 9 288V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 9 288V
The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 288V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 288V scores 20,280 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 63.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,300 vs 21,000 (77.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,174, a 25.2% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 11,888 (17.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+6% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 64 MB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 20,280 | 38,955+92% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,300 | 21,000+126% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800+29% | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | 11,888+19% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 9 288V versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Core Ultra 9 288V supports 166.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 9 288V) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 288V) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533+167% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 9 288V) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Core Ultra 9 288V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140V), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140V | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 9 288V was priced at $600, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($600 vs $549), Ryzen 9 5900X was $51 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 288V delivers 33.8 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 70.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $549-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8 | 71.0+110% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 288V and Ryzen 9 5900X
