E-350 vs Pentium N3510

E-350 vs Pentium N3510 Performance Spectrum

E-350

2 / 2

1,049

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium N3510

4 / 4

1,040

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E-350 vs Pentium N3510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E-350 vs Pentium N3510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E-350

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 224.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.0 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌800% higher power demand at 18W vs 2W.

Pentium N3510

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 18W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,040 vs 1,049).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3510 better than E-350?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium N3510 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E-350 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E-350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3510 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium N3510 comes in 222.0% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. E-350 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E-350 vs Pentium N3510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E-350

The E-350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The E-350 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3510 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3510 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the E-350 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium N3510. The E-350 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium N3510 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E-350 scores 1,049 against the Pentium N3510's 1,040 — a 0.9% lead for the E-350. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E-350 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3510.

Feature	E-350	Pentium N3510
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	40 nm	22 nm-45%
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,049	1,040

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-350 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N3510 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	E-350	Pentium N3510
Socket	FT1	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the E-350 was priced at $50, while the Pentium N3510 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($50 vs $161), E-350 was $111 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the E-350 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 6.5 pts/$ for the Pentium N3510 — making the E-350 the 105.8% better value option.

Feature	E-350	Pentium N3510
MSRP	$50-69%	$161
Performance per Dollar	21.0+223%	6.5
Release Date	2011	2013

Search E-350 on Amazon

Search Pentium N3510 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.