E1-6010 vs Celeron 1019Y

Performance Spectrum - CPU

E1-6010

2 / 2

1,006

+0.1%

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 1019Y

2 / 2

1,005

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-6010 is positioned at rank 878 and the Celeron 1019Y is on rank 441, so the Celeron 1019Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-6010

#866

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1458%

#867

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1437%

#868

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1319%

#869

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1313%

#870

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1301%

#872

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1256%

#873

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1205%

#874

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1203%

#875

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1170%

#878

E1-6010

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#879

Core i5-6440HQ

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

100%

#881

Celeron Dual-Core T1600

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#884

Athlon II N330

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#889

Core i7-7820EQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $378

98%

#890

Celeron 7305

MSRP: $128|Avg: $107

98%

#891

E-300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

97%

#892

Core i7-7820HK

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1019Y

#429

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

584%

#430

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

575%

#431

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

528%

#432

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

526%

#433

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

521%

#435

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

503%

#436

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

482%

#437

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

482%

#438

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

469%

#441

Celeron 1019Y

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E1-6010 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 1019Y in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	E1-6010	Celeron 1019Y
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	E1-6010	Celeron 1019Y
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

E1-6010 Benchmark Check

Celeron 1019Y Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-6010 and Celeron 1019Y

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E1-6010 and Celeron 1019Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 versus 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y — a 29.8% clock advantage for the E1-6010. The E1-6010 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 1019Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E1-6010 scores 1,006 against the Celeron 1019Y's 1,005 — a 0.1% lead for the E1-6010.

Feature	E1-6010	Celeron 1019Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.35 GHz+35%	1 GHz
Base Clock	—	1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Beema (2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,006	1,005

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-6010 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 1019Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	E1-6010	Celeron 1019Y
Socket	FT3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-6010) / VT-x (Celeron 1019Y). The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the E1-6010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U.