E1-6010
VS
Celeron J3060

E1-6010 vs Celeron J3060

AMD

E1-6010

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.35 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron J3060

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.48 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-6010 is positioned at rank 878 and the Celeron J3060 is on rank 313, so the Celeron J3060 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-6010

#866
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1458%
#867
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1437%
#868
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1319%
#869
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1313%
#870
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1301%
#872
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1256%
#873
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1205%
#874
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1203%
#875
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1170%
#878
E1-6010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
98%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
97%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3060

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4606%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4353%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3160%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
952%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
754%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
660%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
378%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
373%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
340%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
340%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
336%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
327%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
322%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
321%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
318%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
99%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
99%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
98%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
98%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
98%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
98%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
98%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
98%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
97%
#313
Celeron J3060
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#314
Athlon 5150
MSRP: $21|Avg: $21
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron J3060 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E1-6010 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightE1-6010Celeron J3060
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE1-6010Celeron J3060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-6010 and Celeron J3060

AMD

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron J3060

The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the E1-6010 and Celeron J3060 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron J3060 — a 59% clock advantage for the Celeron J3060. The E1-6010 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron J3060 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the E1-6010 scores 1,006 against the Celeron J3060's 1,015 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron J3060.

FeatureE1-6010Celeron J3060
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.35 GHz
2.48 GHz+84%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
1 MB
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Airmont (2016)
PassMark
1,006
1,015
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
370
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-6010 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1-6010Celeron J3060
Socket
FT3
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-6010) / VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060). The Celeron J3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the E1-6010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.

FeatureE1-6010Celeron J3060
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop/NAS