E1-6010
VS
Core 2 Duo E4700

E1-6010 vs Core 2 Duo E4700

AMD

E1-6010

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.35 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E4700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-6010 is positioned at rank 878 and the Core 2 Duo E4700 is on rank 1035, so the E1-6010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-6010

#866
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1458%
#867
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1437%
#868
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1319%
#869
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1313%
#870
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1301%
#872
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1256%
#873
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1205%
#874
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1203%
#875
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1170%
#878
E1-6010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
98%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
97%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41015%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
38755%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28139%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8477%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6715%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5874%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3364%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3321%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3023%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3023%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2989%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2909%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2868%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2856%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2831%
#1034
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
100%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
100%
#1036
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
100%
#1037
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
100%
#1038
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
99%
#1039
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1042
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1043
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
96%
#1044
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1045
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
94%
#1046
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
93%
#1047
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
92%
#1048
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
92%
#1049
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1-6010 (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E4700 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo E4700

AMD

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4700

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo E4700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 — a 63.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700. The E1-6010 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E1-6010 scores 1,006 against the Core 2 Duo E4700's 1,011 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4700.

FeatureE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4700
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.35 GHz
2.6 GHz+93%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
2 MB+100%
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
1,006
1,011
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-6010 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4700
Socket
FT3
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-6010) / false (Core 2 Duo E4700). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

FeatureE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4700
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false