E1-6010
VS
Core 2 Duo E4300

E1-6010 vs Core 2 Duo E4300

AMD

E1-6010

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.35 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E4300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-6010 is positioned at rank 878 and the Core 2 Duo E4300 is on rank 1015, so the E1-6010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-6010

#866
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1458%
#867
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1437%
#868
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1319%
#869
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1313%
#870
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1301%
#872
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1256%
#873
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1205%
#874
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1203%
#875
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1170%
#878
E1-6010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
98%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
97%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
35064%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
33132%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24056%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7247%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5740%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5022%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2876%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2839%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2585%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2584%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2556%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2487%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2452%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2442%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2420%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
100%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
99%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
97%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
97%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
97%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
96%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
95%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
95%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
91%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
91%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
90%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1-6010 (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E4300 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo E4300

AMD

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4300

The Core 2 Duo E4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo E4300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4300 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4300. The E1-6010 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E1-6010 scores 1,006 against the Core 2 Duo E4300's 1,005 — a 0.1% lead for the E1-6010.

FeatureE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.35 GHz
1.8 GHz+33%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
2 MB+100%
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
1,006
1,005
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-6010 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4300
Socket
FT3
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-6010) / false (Core 2 Duo E4300). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

FeatureE1-6010Core 2 Duo E4300
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false