Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

E1 Micro-6200T

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2014
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2003
Buy on Amazon

E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ Performance Spectrum

E1 Micro-6200T
2 / 2
475
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 2100+
brand logoAthlon XP 2400+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoMobile Athlon 64 2800+
brand logoRyzen 5 8640HS
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
1 / 1
505
+6.3%
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon 64 2000+
brand logoAthlon 64 2600+
brand logoAthlon XP 3200+
brand logoRyzen 5 8640HS
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
E1 Micro-6200T
low12 FPS
medium12 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra12 FPS
1080P
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
low13 FPS
medium13 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1 Micro-6200T

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 505).
    • ❌300% higher power demand at 4W vs 1W.

    Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

    2003

    Why buy it

    • ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ✅Draws 1W instead of 4W, a 3W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ better than E1 Micro-6200T?
    Yes. Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    E1 Micro-6200T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    E1 Micro-6200T vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    E1 Micro-6200T

    The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

    The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The E1 Micro-6200T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. The E1 Micro-6200T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses Newark (2003). In PassMark, the E1 Micro-6200T scores 475 against the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+'s 505 — a 6.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+.

    FeatureE1 Micro-6200TMobile Athlon 64 3200+
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2+100%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.4 GHz
    2 GHz+43%
    Base Clock
    1 GHz
    —
    L2 Cache
    1024 kB
    1 MB
    Process
    28 nm
    —
    Architecture
    Mullins (2014)
    Newark (2003)
    PassMark
    475
    505+6%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The E1 Micro-6200T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureE1 Micro-6200TMobile Athlon 64 3200+
    Socket
    FT3
    754
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+173%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    —
    400
    Max RAM Capacity
    —
    2
    RAM Channels
    —
    1
    ECC Support
    —
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    —
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (E1 Micro-6200T) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.

    FeatureE1 Micro-6200TMobile Athlon 64 3200+
    Integrated GPU
    —
    No
    IGPU Model
    —
    None
    Unlocked
    —
    No
    AVX-512
    —
    No
    Virtualization
    —
    false