CPU
GPU
Quadro 2000
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon X1350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 is positioned at rank 314 and the Mobility Radeon X1350 is on rank 708, so the Quadro 2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2270% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (1 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1350.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2270%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2270%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 1322% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1322%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 and Mobility Radeon X1350
Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.
Mobility Radeon X1350
The Mobility Radeon X1350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro 2000 scores 948 versus the Mobility Radeon X1350's 40 — the Quadro 2000 leads by 2270%. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the Mobility Radeon X1350 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1350). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1350).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 948+2270% | 40 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+133% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+220% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1350 has 128 MB. The Quadro 2000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+700% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Quadro 2000) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0+22% | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000) vs AVIVO (Mobility Radeon X1350). Decoder: VP4 vs AVIVO.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | AVIVO |
| Decoder | VP4 | AVIVO |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the Mobility Radeon X1350's 50W — a 21.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W | 50W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 178mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 15.3+1813% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Mobility Radeon X1350 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon X1350 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.9 (Quadro 2000) vs 2.7 (Mobility Radeon X1350) — the Quadro 2000 offers 1303.7% better value.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Mobility Radeon X1350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $49-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $15-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.9+1304% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GF106 | Broadway |
| Release | December 24 2010 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #902 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 and Mobility Radeon X1350
