CPU
GPU
Quadro 2000
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 645M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 is positioned at rank 314 and the GeForce GT 645M is on rank 80, so the GeForce GT 645M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 645M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 645M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 | GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 2000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 and GeForce GT 645M
Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce GT 645M
The GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 945 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 scores 948 and the GeForce GT 645M reaches 945 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 645M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 384 (GeForce GT 645M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 645M).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 948 | 945 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 0.5445 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+700% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 645M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 645M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Quadro 2000) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 645M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 11.0 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 645M). Decoder: VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP4 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the GeForce GT 645M's 32W — a 63.8% difference. The GeForce GT 645M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 350W (GeForce GT 645M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 178mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W | 32W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 178mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 15.3 | 29.5+93% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 645M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | — |
| Codename | GF106 | GK107 |
| Release | December 24 2010 | October 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #902 | #903 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 and GeForce GT 645M
