Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 M445

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 M445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 M445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000

2010

Why buy it

✅16.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
139.6% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌313.3% higher power demand at 62W vs 15W.

Radeon R7 M445

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 139.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 62W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 2000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (948 vs 947), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M445 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 139.3% (3.8 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M445 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 M445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R7 M445

The Radeon R7 M445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 scores 948 and the Radeon R7 M445 reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 M445 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M445). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M445).

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 M445
G3D Mark Score	948	947
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	320+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	0.5888 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+60%	20
L1 Cache	256 KB+220%	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 M445
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M445 carries 512 MB. Quadro 2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M445. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M445) — the Quadro 2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 M445
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the Radeon R7 M445's 15W — a 122.1% difference. The Radeon R7 M445 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M445). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 M445
TDP	62W	15W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	178mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	15.3	63.1+312%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon R7 M445 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M445 was 58.3% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000) vs 3.8 (Radeon R7 M445) — the Radeon R7 M445 offers 137.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M445 (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 M445
MSRP	$599	$250-58%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	3.8+137%
Codename	GF106	Meso
Release	December 24 2010	May 15 2016
Ranking	#902	#899

Search Quadro 2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M445 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.