Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000

2010

Why buy it

✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
505.1% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌37.8% higher power demand at 62W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 503.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 62W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 2000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (948 vs 946), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6670/7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 503.8% (9.6 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 scores 948 and the Radeon HD 6670/7670 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670).

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon HD 6670/7670
G3D Mark Score	948	946
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	480+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS+20%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	256 KB+433%	48 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon HD 6670/7670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 carries 512 MB. Quadro 2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670/7670.

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon HD 6670/7670
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 6670/7670's 45W — a 31.8% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon HD 6670/7670
TDP	62W	45W-27%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	178mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	15.3	21.0+37%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6670/7670 was 83.5% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers 500% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6670/7670 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP	$599	$99-83%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	9.6+500%
Codename	GF106	Turks
Release	December 24 2010	January 5 2012
Ranking	#902	#870

Search Quadro 2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6670/7670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.