Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000

2010Core: 625 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4850

2008Core: 625 MHz

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 62W instead of 110W, a 48W reduction.
  • βœ…Measures 178mm instead of 246mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • βœ…More future proof: Fermi (2010βˆ’2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4850 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    201% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4850

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Costs $400 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 200.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌77.4% higher power demand at 110W vs 62W.
  • ❌38.2% longer card at 246mm vs 178mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4850 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 2000 instead at 948 vs 946, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4850 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 200.4% (4.8 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4850 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon HD 4850

The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 scores 948 and the Radeon HD 4850 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850).

FeatureQuadro 2000Radeon HD 4850
G3D Mark Score
948
946
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
192
800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
1 TFLOPS+108%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
256 KB+60%
160 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 2000Radeon HD 4850
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 4850 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850.

FeatureQuadro 2000Radeon HD 4850
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Quadro 2000) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro 2000Radeon HD 4850
DirectX
11_0+9%
10.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000) vs None (Radeon HD 4850). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 2.2.

FeatureQuadro 2000Radeon HD 4850
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
None
Decoder
VP4
UVD 2.2
Codecs
β€”
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 4850's 110W β€” a 55.8% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 178mm vs 246mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro 2000Radeon HD 4850
TDP
62W-44%
110W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
178mm
246mm
Height
β€”
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
β€”
95
Perf/Watt
15.3+78%
8.6
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4850 was 66.8% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) β€” the Radeon HD 4850 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 2000 (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro 2000Radeon HD 4850
MSRP
$599
$199-67%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
4.8+200%
Codename
GF106
RV770
Release
December 24 2010
June 25 2008
Ranking
#902
#876

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.