Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro 2000
2010Why buy it
- β Draws 62W instead of 110W, a 48W reduction.
- β Measures 178mm instead of 246mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- β More future proof: Fermi (2010β2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD 4850 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β201% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4850
2008Why buy it
- β 7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $400 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β Delivers 200.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- β2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β77.4% higher power demand at 110W vs 62W.
- β38.2% longer card at 246mm vs 178mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 4850 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 4850
The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 scores 948 and the Radeon HD 4850 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 948 | 946 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+108% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+60% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 4850 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Quadro 2000) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0+9% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000) vs None (Radeon HD 4850). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | None |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | β | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 4850's 110W β a 55.8% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 178mm vs 246mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W-44% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 178mm | 246mm |
| Height | β | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | β | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.3+78% | 8.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro 2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4850 was 66.8% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) β the Radeon HD 4850 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 2000 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $199-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 4.8+200% |
| Codename | GF106 | RV770 |
| Release | December 24 2010 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #902 | #876 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















