E2-2000 vs Pentium D 940

E2-2000 vs Pentium D 940 Performance Spectrum

E2-2000

2 / 2

880

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium D 940

2 / 2

875

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-2000 vs Pentium D 940 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-2000 vs Pentium D 940: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-2000

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 18W instead of 130W, a 112W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium D 940

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (875 vs 880).
❌Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while E2-2000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌622.2% higher power demand at 130W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-2000 better than Pentium D 940?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium D 940 is ahead with 82.9% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E2-2000 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-2000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-2000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-2000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $132 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. Pentium D 940 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (6.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-2000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-2000 vs Pentium D 940 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-2000

The E2-2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 880 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium D 940

The Pentium D 940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 January 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 875 points. Launch price was $423.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E2-2000 and Pentium D 940 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.75 GHz on the E2-2000 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium D 940 — a 58.6% clock advantage for the Pentium D 940. The E2-2000 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium D 940 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-2000 scores 880 against the Pentium D 940's 875 — a 0.6% lead for the E2-2000. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	E2-2000	Pentium D 940
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.75 GHz	3.2 GHz+83%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (total)
Process	40 nm-38%	65 nm
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	880	875

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-2000 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium D 940 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.