E2-2000 vs Pentium U5600

E2-2000 vs Pentium U5600 Performance Spectrum

E2-2000

2 / 2

880

+5.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium U5600

2 / 2

835

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-2000 vs Pentium U5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-2000 vs Pentium U5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-2000

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium U5600

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E2-2000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (835 vs 880).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while E2-2000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-2000 better than Pentium U5600?

Yes. E2-2000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-2000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-2000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-2000 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. E2-2000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium U5600 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-2000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-2000 vs Pentium U5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-2000

The E2-2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 880 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium U5600

The Pentium U5600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 835 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E2-2000 and Pentium U5600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.75 GHz on the E2-2000 versus 1.33 GHz on the Pentium U5600 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the E2-2000. The E2-2000 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium U5600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E2-2000 scores 880 against the Pentium U5600's 835 — a 5.2% lead for the E2-2000. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-2000 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium U5600.

Feature	E2-2000	Pentium U5600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.75 GHz+32%	1.33 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.33 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	40 nm	32 nm-20%
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	880+5%	835

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-2000 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium U5600 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.