E2-2000
VS
Pentium U5600

E2-2000 vs Pentium U5600

AMD

E2-2000

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.75 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium U5600

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-2000 is positioned at rank 987 and the Pentium U5600 is on rank 1122, so the E2-2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-2000

#975
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2000%
#976
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1971%
#977
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1809%
#978
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1801%
#979
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1784%
#981
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1723%
#982
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1652%
#983
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1650%
#984
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1605%
#987
E2-2000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
99%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
98%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
98%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
96%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
96%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
95%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium U5600

#1110
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3514%
#1111
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3462%
#1112
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3178%
#1113
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3164%
#1114
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3135%
#1116
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3028%
#1117
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2903%
#1118
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2898%
#1119
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2820%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#1124
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
98%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
98%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E2-2000 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium U5600 in both compute-intensive tasks (5.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightE2-2000Pentium U5600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE2-2000Pentium U5600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-2000 and Pentium U5600

AMD

E2-2000

The E2-2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 880 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium U5600

The Pentium U5600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 835 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the E2-2000 and Pentium U5600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.75 GHz on the E2-2000 versus 1.33 GHz on the Pentium U5600 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the E2-2000. The E2-2000 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium U5600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E2-2000 scores 880 against the Pentium U5600's 835 — a 5.2% lead for the E2-2000. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-2000 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium U5600.

FeatureE2-2000Pentium U5600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.75 GHz+32%
1.33 GHz
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
40 nm
32 nm-20%
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
880+5%
835
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-2000 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium U5600 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-2000Pentium U5600
Socket
FT1
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0