E2-2000
VS
Pentium T3400

E2-2000 vs Pentium T3400

AMD

E2-2000

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.75 GHz2013
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-2000 is positioned at rank 987 and the Pentium T3400 is on rank 1194, so the E2-2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-2000

#975
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2000%
#976
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1971%
#977
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1809%
#978
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1801%
#979
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1784%
#981
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1723%
#982
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1652%
#983
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1650%
#984
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1605%
#987
E2-2000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
99%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
98%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
98%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
96%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
96%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
95%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium T3400

#1182
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5211%
#1183
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5135%
#1184
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4714%
#1185
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4693%
#1186
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4650%
#1188
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4490%
#1189
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4306%
#1190
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4298%
#1191
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4183%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
100%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
99%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
95%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
91%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
91%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
90%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
90%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
88%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
87%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E2-2000 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium T3400 in both compute-intensive tasks (4.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightE2-2000Pentium T3400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($90)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE2-2000Pentium T3400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($90)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-2000 and Pentium T3400

AMD

E2-2000

The E2-2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 880 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium T3400

The Pentium T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 845 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The E2-2000 is built on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the E2-2000 scores 880 against the Pentium T3400's 845 — a 4.1% lead for the E2-2000. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-2000 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T3400.

FeatureE2-2000Pentium T3400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.75 GHz
Base Clock
2.16 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
40 nm-38%
65 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
880+4%
845
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-2000 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T3400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-2000Pentium T3400
Socket
FT1
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
E2-2000 vs Pentium T3400