E2-2000 vs Pentium T3400

E2-2000 vs Pentium T3400 Performance Spectrum

E2-2000

2 / 2

880

+4.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium T3400

845

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-2000 vs Pentium T3400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-2000 vs Pentium T3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-2000

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 18W instead of 35W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T3400

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E2-2000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (845 vs 880).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while E2-2000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌94.4% higher power demand at 35W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-2000 better than Pentium T3400?

Yes. E2-2000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-2000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-2000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-2000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-2000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T3400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-2000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-2000 vs Pentium T3400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-2000

The E2-2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 880 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium T3400

The Pentium T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 845 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-2000 is built on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the E2-2000 scores 880 against the Pentium T3400's 845 — a 4.1% lead for the E2-2000. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E2-2000 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T3400.

Feature	E2-2000	Pentium T3400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.75 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.16 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	40 nm-38%	65 nm
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	880+4%	845

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-2000 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T3400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.