
Radeon 3000 vs Quadro 7000

Radeon 3000
Popular choices:

Quadro 7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3000 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon 3000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 7000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3476.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3000.
| Insight | Radeon 3000 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3476.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3476.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 7000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $300 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 484.2% better value per dollar than the Radeon 3000.
| Insight | Radeon 3000 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+484.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3000 and Quadro 7000

Radeon 3000
The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Quadro 7000
The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 3000 scores 98 versus the Quadro 7000's 3,505 — the Quadro 7000 leads by 3476.5%. The Radeon 3000 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro 7000 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3000) vs 512 (Quadro 7000). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000) vs 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000).
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 98 | 3,505+3477% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 1.3322 TFLOPS+7% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 896 KB+600% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 3000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 7000 has 6 GB. The Quadro 7000 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 3000) vs 768 KB (Quadro 7000) — the Quadro 7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3000 draws 50W versus the Quadro 7000's 204W — a 121.3% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3000) vs 350W (Quadro 7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-75% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 17.2+760% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 3000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Quadro 7000 launched at $14499 and now averages $300. The Radeon 3000 costs 83.7% less ($251 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Radeon 3000) vs 11.7 (Quadro 7000) — the Quadro 7000 offers 485% better value. The Radeon 3000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon 3000 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $14499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-84% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 11.7+485% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | GF110 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 2 2012 |
| Ranking | #757 | #541 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















