Radeon 3000 vs Quadro FX Go1400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX Go1400

#334

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

14483%

#349

Quadro FX Go1400

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

96%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

95%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

93%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

92%

#355

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

89%

#356

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

89%

#357

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

88%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

87%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

86%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

86%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

84%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 3000 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon 3000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX Go1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3000.

Insight	Radeon 3000	Quadro FX Go1400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%)
Longevity	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX Go1400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 3000 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX Go1400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3000 and Quadro FX Go1400

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 3000 scores 98 and the Quadro FX Go1400 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3000 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro FX Go1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3000) vs 192 (Quadro FX Go1400). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400).

Feature	Radeon 3000	Quadro FX Go1400
G3D Mark Score	98	102+4%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512+167%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS+170%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 3000	Quadro FX Go1400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 3000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX Go1400 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 3000) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX Go1400) — the Radeon 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Quadro FX Go1400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3000 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3000) vs 350W (Quadro FX Go1400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.