Radeon 3000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

#626

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

5220%

#628

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

4732%

#629

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

4719%

#633

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

4291%

#634

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

4262%

#636

GeForce 8400M GS

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

100%

#637

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#638

GeForce 9100

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

99%

#639

GeForce 8300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

98%

#640

GeForce 9600M GT

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

98%

#641

Mobility Radeon HD 3430

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

96%

#642

Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

95%

#643

GeForce 9500 GS

MSRP: $110|Avg: $10

94%

#644

GeForce 9300GE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

94%

#645

Mobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

92%

#646

GeForce 9500 GT

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

91%

#647

Mobility Radeon HD 4270

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

91%

#648

GeForce 8500 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $15

91%

#649

Mobility Radeon X1600

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

90%

#650

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

90%

#651

GeForce 9400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 3000 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The Radeon 3000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 3000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon 3000	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%)
Longevity	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon 3000.

Insight	Radeon 3000	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4.1%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 3000 Benchmark Check

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3000 and Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 3000 scores 98 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3000 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3000) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT).

Feature	Radeon 3000	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
G3D Mark Score	98	102+4%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512	800 ×2+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS+42%	0.88 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs	16	16 ×2
TMUs	32	40 ×2+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 3000	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 3000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB. The Radeon 3000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 3000) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the Radeon 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Radeon 3000) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
DirectX	10_0	10.0
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Radeon 3000) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Decoder: Avivo HD vs UVD 1.0.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Encoder	Avivo HD	Avivo HD
Decoder	Avivo HD	UVD 1.0
Codecs	—	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3000 draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT's 30W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3000) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
TDP	50W	30W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	2.0	3.4+70%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 3000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $49 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Radeon 3000) vs 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 5% better value. The Radeon 3000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).