E2-7110 vs Xeon E3-1220L

E2-7110 vs Xeon E3-1220L Performance Spectrum

E2-7110

4 / 4

2,282

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E3-1220L

2 / 4

2,263

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-7110 vs Xeon E3-1220L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-7110 vs Xeon E3-1220L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 20W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E3-1220L

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E2-7110 across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,263 vs 2,282).
❌Launch MSRP is still $189 MSRP, while E2-7110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 20W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-7110 better than Xeon E3-1220L?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1220L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while E2-7110 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-7110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 24 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-7110 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1220L is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. E2-7110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $189 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1220L is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-7110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-7110 vs Xeon E3-1220L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

Xeon E3-1220L

The Xeon E3-1220L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,263 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-7110 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E3-1220L offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the E2-7110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220L — a 61.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220L. The E2-7110 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220L uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E2-7110 scores 2,282 against the Xeon E3-1220L's 2,263 — a 0.8% lead for the E2-7110.

Feature	E2-7110	Xeon E3-1220L
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	3.4 GHz+89%
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,282	2,263

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-7110 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1220L uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.