E2-7110 vs Xeon X3350

E2-7110 vs Xeon X3350 Performance Spectrum

E2-7110

4 / 4

2,282

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3350

2,291

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-7110 vs Xeon X3350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-7110 vs Xeon X3350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,282 vs 2,291).

Xeon X3350

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3350 better than E2-7110?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3350 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while E2-7110 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X3350 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X3350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-7110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E2-7110 vs Xeon X3350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

Xeon X3350

The Xeon X3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,291 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-7110 is built on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the E2-7110 scores 2,282 against the Xeon X3350's 2,291 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X3350.

Feature	E2-7110	Xeon X3350
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2048 kB	—
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	—
PassMark	2,282	2,291