E2-7110 vs Xeon L5520

E2-7110 vs Xeon L5520 Performance Spectrum

E2-7110

4 / 4

2,282

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5520

4 / 8

2,274

0.0%

Celeron 847

Core i3-530

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-7110 vs Xeon L5520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-7110 vs Xeon L5520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5520, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon L5520

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,274 vs 2,282).
❌300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-7110 better than Xeon L5520?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5520 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while E2-7110 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-7110 still makes the most sense overall. E2-7110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-7110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-7110 vs Xeon L5520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

Xeon L5520

The Xeon L5520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,274 points. Launch price was $100.

⚡

Processing Power

The E2-7110 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon L5520's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 versus 2.48 GHz on the Xeon L5520 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Xeon L5520. The E2-7110 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon L5520 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E2-7110 scores 2,282 against the Xeon L5520's 2,274 — a 0.4% lead for the E2-7110.

Feature	E2-7110	Xeon L5520
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.48 GHz+38%
Base Clock	—	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,282	2,274