E2-9000 vs Pentium G2030

AMD

E2-9000

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G2030

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WW2013
Similar parts
·······

E2-9000 vs Pentium G2030 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-9000 vs Pentium G2030 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-9000 vs Pentium G2030: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-9000

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 1W instead of 55W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Pentium G2030 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium G2030.

Pentium G2030

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1), while E2-9000 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike E2-9000.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E2-9000 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,769 vs 1,787).
  • Launch MSRP is still $85 MSRP, while E2-9000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 5400% higher power demand at 55W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-9000 better than Pentium G2030?
Yes. E2-9000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, E2-9000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.3% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-9000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
E2-9000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-9000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $85 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G2030 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
E2-9000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-9000 vs Pentium G2030 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

E2-9000

The E2-9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,787 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium G2030

The Pentium G2030 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,769 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the E2-9000 and Pentium G2030 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The E2-9000 is built on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the E2-9000 scores 1,787 against the Pentium G2030's 1,769 — a 1% lead for the E2-9000.

FeatureE2-9000Pentium G2030
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,787+1%
1,769
Cinebench R23 Multi
608
Geekbench 6 Single
492
Geekbench 6 Multi
826
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-9000 uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G2030 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-9000Pentium G2030
Socket
BGA
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-9000) / VT-x (Pentium G2030). The Pentium G2030 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)), while the E2-9000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G2030 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium G2030 rivals Core i3-2100.

FeatureE2-9000Pentium G2030
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget