EPYC 4124P
VS
Core Ultra 5 236V

EPYC 4124P vs Core Ultra 5 236V

AMD

EPYC 4124P

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 236V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4124P

#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
102%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
101%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
101%
#103
EPYC 4124P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 4124P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 4124PCore Ultra 5 236V
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($403)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 5 236V ($403), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($403 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 4124PCore Ultra 5 236V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($403)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4124P and Core Ultra 5 236V

AMD

EPYC 4124P

The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 236V

The Core Ultra 5 236V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,313 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4124P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 236V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 5 236V has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P versus 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 236V — a 8.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4124P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4124P scores 18,139 against the Core Ultra 5 236V's 18,313 — a 1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 236V. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 236V.

FeatureEPYC 4124PCore Ultra 5 236V
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+9%
4.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+81%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+300%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+150%
Process
5 nm
3 nm-40%
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
18,139
18,313
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4124P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 4124PCore Ultra 5 236V
Socket
AM5
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 236V). The EPYC 4124P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core Ultra 5 236V requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T.

FeatureEPYC 4124PCore Ultra 5 236V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
Entry Server