
EPYC 4124P

Ryzen 7 3700X
EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4124P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,139 vs 22,430).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4124P, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 4124P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4124P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4124P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 4124P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4124P vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4124P
The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4124P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 14.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 4124P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4124P scores 18,139 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 21.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | EPYC 4124P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+16% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 18,139 | 22,430+24% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4124P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4124P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 4124P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4124P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4124P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 4124P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4124P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | EPYC 4124P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The EPYC 4124P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T.
| Feature | EPYC 4124P | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | — |
| Target Use | Entry Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













