
EPYC 4344P

Ryzen 9 5900X
EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4344P
2024Why buy it
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Delivers 44.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,500 vs 21,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4344P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4344P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while EPYC 4344P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than EPYC 4344P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4344P vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4344P
The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X β a 9.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023β2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 β a 14.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 21,000 (7.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,960 vs 2,174, a 10.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,896 vs 11,888 (145% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+10% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023β2025) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 33,821 | 38,955+15% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500 | 21,000+8% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | 2,174+11% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,896 | 11,888+527% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X β the EPYC 4344P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4344P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) β the EPYC 4344P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4344P) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4344P supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4344P was priced at $329, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($329 vs $549), EPYC 4344P was $220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X β making the EPYC 4344P the 36.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-40% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 102.8+45% | 71.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














