
EPYC 4465P

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Civilization VI
EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4465P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+46.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 50,216).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4465P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4465P better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4465P
The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4465P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 4465P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 7.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 37.7% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 50,216+46% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 5200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4465P) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4465P was priced at $399, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($399 vs $449), EPYC 4465P was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the EPYC 4465P the 48.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-11% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+65% | 76.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














