
EPYC 4465P vs Xeon w7-3445

EPYC 4465P

Xeon w7-3445
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4465P
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3445
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 4465P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($399) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,596) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Grado (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 4465P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+567%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($399) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,596) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4465P and Xeon w7-3445

EPYC 4465P
The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.

Xeon w7-3445
The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4465P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w7-3445 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 20 / 40+67% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+31% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+22% | 52.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 50,216+3% | 48,991 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4465P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4465P versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-3445 — the EPYC 4465P supports 8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3445 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4465P) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3445). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4465P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+8% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 112+300% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-3445). The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w7-3445 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4465P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3445 debuted at $1989. At current prices ($399 vs $2596), the EPYC 4465P is $2197 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the EPYC 4465P the 147.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-80% | $1989 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $399-85% | $2596 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+566% | 18.9 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















