EPYC 4465P vs Xeon w7-3445

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4465P

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3445

20 Cores40 Thrd270 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4465P vs Xeon w7-3445 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4465P

12 / 24

50,216

+2.5%

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon w7-3445

20 / 40

48,991

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4465P vs Xeon w7-3445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4465P vs Xeon w7-3445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4465P

2025

Why buy it

✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 53 MB).
✅Costs $1,590 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Delivers 411.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon w7-3445 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon w7-3445

2023

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,991 vs 50,216).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($1,989 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4465P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4465P better than Xeon w7-3445?

Yes. EPYC 4465P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4465P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4465P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 21.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4465P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4465P comes in $1,590 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $1,989 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 411.0% better value on MSRP (125.9 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4465P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 21.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 53 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4465P vs Xeon w7-3445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4465P

The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.

Xeon w7-3445

The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4465P packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w7-3445 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	Xeon w7-3445
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	20 / 40+67%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+13%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+31%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+22%	52.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	50,216+3%	48,991

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4465P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4465P versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-3445 — the EPYC 4465P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3445 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4465P) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3445). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4465P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).

Feature	EPYC 4465P	Xeon w7-3445
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5200+8%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	128	4096+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	112+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-3445). The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w7-3445 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	Xeon w7-3445
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4465P was priced at $399, while the Xeon w7-3445 came in at $1989. On launch pricing ($399 vs $1989), EPYC 4465P was $1590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the EPYC 4465P the 134.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4465P	Xeon w7-3445
MSRP	$399-80%	$1989
Performance per Dollar	125.9+412%	24.6
Release Date	2025	2023

Search EPYC 4465P on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3445 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.