
EPYC 4545P
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6438N
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,802 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 527.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6438N needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6438N
2023Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (52,789 vs 54,255).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4545P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4545P
2025Xeon Gold 6438N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,802 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 527.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6438N needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (52,789 vs 54,255).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4545P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4545P better than Xeon Gold 6438N?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6438N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6438N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6438N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 956 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 837 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 793 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 705 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6438N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1072 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 835 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 720 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 622 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 842 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 747 FPS | 630 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4545P and Xeon Gold 6438N

EPYC 4545P
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 6438N
Xeon Gold 6438N
The Xeon Gold 6438N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 52,789 points. Launch price was $3,351.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4545P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6438N offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6438N has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6438N — a 40% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 4545P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6438N uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4545P scores 54,255 against the Xeon Gold 6438N's 52,789 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 4545P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6438N.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6438N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+50% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+7% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 54,255+3% | 52,789 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4545P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6438N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4545P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Gold 6438N — the EPYC 4545P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6438N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4545P) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6438N). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4545P) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6438N) — the Xeon Gold 6438N offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4545P) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6438N).
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6438N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096 GB+2236962033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4545P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6438N). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6438N requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6438N targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Gold 6438N rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6438N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4545P launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6438N debuted at $3351. On MSRP ($549 vs $3351), the EPYC 4545P is $2802 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4545P delivers 98.8 pts/$ vs 15.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6438N — making the EPYC 4545P the 145% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4545P | Xeon Gold 6438N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-84% | $3351 |
| Performance per Dollar | 98.8+525% | 15.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













