EPYC 7232P
VS
Xeon Silver 4214R

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon Silver 4214R

AMD

EPYC 7232P

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4214R

12 Cores24 Thrd100 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7232P

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#116
EPYC 7232P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
99%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
94%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4214R

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
104%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
102%
#118
Xeon Silver 4214R
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
100%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
95%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Xeon Silver 4214R leads in gaming performance. However, the EPYC 7232P is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightEPYC 7232PXeon Silver 4214R
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightEPYC 7232PXeon Silver 4214R
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7232P and Xeon Silver 4214R

AMD

EPYC 7232P

The EPYC 7232P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,712 points. Launch price was $450.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4214R

The Xeon Silver 4214R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,489 points. Launch price was $705.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7232P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4214R offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4214R has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7232P versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4214R — a 9% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4214R (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7232P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4214R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7232P scores 17,712 against the Xeon Silver 4214R's 17,489 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7232P. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the EPYC 7232P vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4214R.

FeatureEPYC 7232PXeon Silver 4214R
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+29%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16.5 MB+3%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
12 MB+2300%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
17,712+1%
17,489
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7232P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4214R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7232PXeon Silver 4214R
Socket
SP3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
1024
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7232P) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4214R). Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4214R rivals EPYC 7302P.

FeatureEPYC 7232PXeon Silver 4214R
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d