
EPYC 7262
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7262
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,346 vs 1,713).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,500 vs 11,741).
- ❌933.3% higher power demand at 155W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 6800U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 6800U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 6800U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+27.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 155W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while EPYC 7262 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7262, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $360 MSRP, while EPYC 7262 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7262
2019Ryzen 7 6800U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+27.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 155W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while EPYC 7262 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,346 vs 1,713).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,500 vs 11,741).
- ❌933.3% higher power demand at 155W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 6800U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 6800U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7262, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $360 MSRP, while EPYC 7262 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 6800U better than EPYC 7262?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7262 | Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7262 | Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7262 | Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7262 | Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 6800U

EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262
The EPYC 7262 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,779 points. Launch price was $575.


Ryzen 7 6800U
Ryzen 7 6800U
The Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,619 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 6800U share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7262 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800U — a 32.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 6800U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7262 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 6800U uses Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7262 scores 20,779 against the Ryzen 7 6800U's 20,619 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7262. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 11,741 (2.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 6800U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,346 vs 1,713, a 24% lead for the Ryzen 7 6800U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,900 vs 7,397 (6.6% advantage for the EPYC 7262). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7262 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 6800U.
| Feature | EPYC 7262 | Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+19% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 20,779 | 20,619 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,500 | 11,741+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,346 | 1,713+27% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,900+7% | 7,397 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7262 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 6800U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7262 versus LPDDR5-6400 on the Ryzen 7 6800U — the Ryzen 7 6800U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7262 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7262) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 6800U). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7262) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 6800U) — the EPYC 7262 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7262) and SoC (Ryzen 7 6800U).
| Feature | EPYC 7262 | Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+6300% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+540% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7262) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 6800U). The Ryzen 7 6800U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the EPYC 7262 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7262 targets Budget Server / Multi-thread computing, Ryzen 7 6800U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: EPYC 7262 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; Ryzen 7 6800U rivals Core i7-1255U.
| Feature | EPYC 7262 | Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | Budget Server / Multi-thread computing | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












