EPYC 7262 vs Xeon E-2456

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon E-2456 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7262

8 / 16

20,779

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2456

6 / 12

20,705

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon E-2456 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon E-2456: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7262

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2456 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌93.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2456 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon E-2456

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 155W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,705 vs 20,779).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2456 better than EPYC 7262?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E-2456 is ahead with a 16.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7262 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. EPYC 7262 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7262 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2456 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2456 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2456 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon E-2456 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7262

The EPYC 7262 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,779 points. Launch price was $575.

Xeon E-2456

The Xeon E-2456 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,705 points. Launch price was $375.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7262 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2456 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7262 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7262 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2456 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2456 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7262 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon E-2456 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7262 scores 20,779 against the Xeon E-2456's 20,705 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7262. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7262 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2456.

Feature	EPYC 7262	Xeon E-2456
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+50%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+78%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	20,779	20,705
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,346	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7262 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2456 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 7262	Xeon E-2456
Socket	SP3	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	—
RAM Channels	8	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	128	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7262) / not specified (Xeon E-2456). Primary use case: EPYC 7262 targets Budget Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7262 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.