EPYC 7262 vs Xeon 6337P

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon 6337P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7262

8 / 16

20,779

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon 6337P

6 / 12

20,917

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon 6337P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon 6337P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7262

2019

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6337P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,779 vs 20,917).
❌93.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6337P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon 6337P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 155W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while EPYC 7262 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6337P better than EPYC 7262?

Yes. Xeon 6337P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6337P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6337P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6337P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6337P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (348.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6337P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon 6337P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7262

The EPYC 7262 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,779 points. Launch price was $575.

Xeon 6337P

The Xeon 6337P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,917 points. Launch price was $375.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7262 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6337P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7262 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7262 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon 6337P — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Xeon 6337P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7262 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon 6337P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7262 scores 20,779 against the Xeon 6337P's 20,917 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon 6337P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7262 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6337P.

Feature	EPYC 7262	Xeon 6337P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	5 GHz+47%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+78%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	20,779	20,917
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,346	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7262 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6337P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 7262	Xeon 6337P
Socket	SP3	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	—
RAM Channels	8	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	128	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7262) / not specified (Xeon 6337P). Primary use case: EPYC 7262 targets Budget Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7262 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.