EPYC 7262 vs Xeon Silver 4310T

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon Silver 4310T Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7262

8 / 16

20,779

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Silver 4310T

10 / 20

20,665

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon Silver 4310T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon Silver 4310T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7262

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.

Xeon Silver 4310T

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,665 vs 20,779).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7262 better than Xeon Silver 4310T?

Yes. EPYC 7262 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7262 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7262 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7262 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4310T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7262 vs Xeon Silver 4310T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7262

The EPYC 7262 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,779 points. Launch price was $575.

Xeon Silver 4310T

The Xeon Silver 4310T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 20,665 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7262 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4310T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4310T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7262 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4310T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7262 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4310T uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7262 scores 20,779 against the Xeon Silver 4310T's 20,665 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 7262. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7262 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4310T.

Feature	EPYC 7262	Xeon Silver 4310T
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+113%	15 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	20,779	20,665
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,346	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7262 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4310T uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 7262	Xeon Silver 4310T
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	—
RAM Channels	8	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	128	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7262) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4310T). Primary use case: EPYC 7262 targets Budget Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7262 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.