
EPYC 7303
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7303
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,298 vs 28,572).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 7303 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7303
2023Ryzen 7 5800X3D
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,298 vs 28,572).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 7303 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X3D better than EPYC 7303?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 644 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 566 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 707 FPS |
| medium | 714 FPS | 707 FPS |
| high | 696 FPS | 707 FPS |
| ultra | 610 FPS | 707 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 707 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 707 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 531 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7303 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D

EPYC 7303
EPYC 7303
The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.


Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,298 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7303 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7303 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X3D (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7303 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303 scores 28,572 against the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's 28,298 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7303. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 28,572 | 28,298 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7303 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7303 supports up to 204 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 45.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X3D) — the EPYC 7303 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7303) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 7 5800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 204 GB+59% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5800X3D). Primary use case: EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | — |
| Target Use | High-frequency Server Workloads | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












