
EPYC 7303

Xeon W-2191B
EPYC 7303 vs Xeon W-2191B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7303 vs Xeon W-2191B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7303 vs Xeon W-2191B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7303
2023Why buy it
- β +0.7% higher PassMark.
- β +158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- β Draws 130W instead of 140W, a 10W reduction.
- β 166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2191B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βNo AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-2191B
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (28,362 vs 28,572).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $1,333 MSRP, while EPYC 7303 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7303 better than Xeon W-2191B?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7303 vs Xeon W-2191B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7303
The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.

Xeon W-2191B
The Xeon W-2191B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,362 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7303 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-2191B offers 18 cores / 36 threads β the Xeon W-2191B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2191B β a 23.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2191B (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7303 uses the Milan (2021β2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-2191B uses Skylake (server) (2017β2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303 scores 28,572 against the Xeon W-2191B's 28,362 β a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7303. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303 vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2191B.
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 18 / 36+13% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+4% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+159% | 24.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021β2023) | Skylake (server) (2017β2018) |
| PassMark | 28,572 | 28,362 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | β |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7303 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2191B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7303 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2191B β the EPYC 7303 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2191B supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 204 GB β 151% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303) vs 4 (Xeon W-2191B). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303) vs 48 (Xeon W-2191B) β the EPYC 7303 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 204 GB | 512 GB+151% |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 7303 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-2191B supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2191B). Primary use case: EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Xeon W-2191B targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-frequency Server Workloads | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















