EPYC 7313 vs Xeon 6724P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7313

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6724P

16 Cores32 Thrd210 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7313 vs Xeon 6724P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7313

16 / 32

38,938

+2.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6724P

16 / 32

38,061

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7313 vs Xeon 6724P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7313 vs Xeon 6724P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7313

2021

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 72 MB).
✅Costs $2,539 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
✅Delivers 242.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 210W, a 55W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6724P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,264 vs 25,000).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6724P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6724P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (72 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
❌35.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6724P better than EPYC 7313?

Yes. Xeon 6724P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 19.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 63.8% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6724P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6724P is the stronger fit. You are getting 63.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6724P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7313 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6724P comes in 234.4% more expensive on MSRP at $3,622 MSRP versus $1,083 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7313 is also 242.1% better value on MSRP (36.0 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6724P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7313 vs Xeon 6724P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7313

The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.

Xeon 6724P

The Xeon 6724P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 38,061 points. Launch price was $3,622.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7313 and Xeon 6724P share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6724P — a 15% clock advantage for the Xeon 6724P (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7313 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6724P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313 scores 38,938 against the Xeon 6724P's 38,061 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 7313. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,736 vs 1,800, a 3.6% lead for the Xeon 6724P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,264 vs 25,000 (48.4% advantage for the Xeon 6724P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313 vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6724P.

Feature	EPYC 7313	Xeon 6724P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.3 GHz+16%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+78%	72 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	38,938+2%	38,061
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,736	1,800+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,264	25,000+64%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7313 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6724P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7313 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6724P — the Xeon 6724P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313) vs 88 (Xeon 6724P) — the EPYC 7313 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313) and C741 (Xeon 6724P).

Feature	EPYC 7313	Xeon 6724P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6724P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6724P). Primary use case: EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing, Xeon 6724P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326; Xeon 6724P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 7313	Xeon 6724P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Server / High-load computing	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7313 was priced at $1083, while the Xeon 6724P came in at $3622. On launch pricing ($1083 vs $3622), EPYC 7313 was $2539 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313 delivers 36.0 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6724P — making the EPYC 7313 the 109.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7313	Xeon 6724P
MSRP	$1083-70%	$3622
Performance per Dollar	36.0+243%	10.5
Release Date	2021	2025

Search EPYC 7313 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6724P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.