EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD

EPYC 7351

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 6800H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7351

2017

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 6800H across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 244.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 45W.
  • Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 6800H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 6800H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 6800H

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 155W, a 110W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while EPYC 7351 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,932 vs 23,226).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 6800H better than EPYC 7351?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7351 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 6800H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351 is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 6800H still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 7 6800H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 6800H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 6800H
1080p
low183 FPS168 FPS
medium160 FPS148 FPS
high128 FPS120 FPS
ultra102 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low151 FPS143 FPS
medium126 FPS122 FPS
high96 FPS98 FPS
ultra77 FPS83 FPS
4K
low70 FPS79 FPS
medium62 FPS72 FPS
high48 FPS58 FPS
ultra39 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 6800H
1080p
low353 FPS428 FPS
medium321 FPS362 FPS
high271 FPS316 FPS
ultra219 FPS281 FPS
1440p
low305 FPS370 FPS
medium279 FPS323 FPS
high239 FPS287 FPS
ultra187 FPS247 FPS
4K
low190 FPS254 FPS
medium176 FPS229 FPS
high151 FPS215 FPS
ultra122 FPS186 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 6800H
1080p
low581 FPS573 FPS
medium513 FPS564 FPS
high462 FPS485 FPS
ultra396 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low513 FPS573 FPS
medium428 FPS510 FPS
high376 FPS437 FPS
ultra323 FPS355 FPS
4K
low381 FPS432 FPS
medium305 FPS368 FPS
high269 FPS323 FPS
ultra219 FPS262 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 6800H
1080p
low581 FPS573 FPS
medium581 FPS573 FPS
high581 FPS573 FPS
ultra569 FPS573 FPS
1440p
low581 FPS573 FPS
medium581 FPS573 FPS
high504 FPS573 FPS
ultra425 FPS513 FPS
4K
low477 FPS536 FPS
medium430 FPS489 FPS
high378 FPS438 FPS
ultra323 FPS379 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

AMD

Ryzen 7 6800H

The Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,932 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 6800H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800H — a 47.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 6800H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 6800H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Ryzen 7 6800H's 22,932 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7351. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 6800H.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 6800H
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
4.7 GHz+62%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+300%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
23,226+1%
22,932
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,957
Geekbench 6 Single
1,845
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,861
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 6800H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 6800H
Socket
TR4
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7351) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 6800H). The Ryzen 7 6800H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the EPYC 7351 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 6800H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 6800H rivals Core i7-12700H.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 6800H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V (SVM)
Target Use
Gaming