EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-1370

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-1370 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7351

16 / 32

23,226

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1370

8 / 16

22,948

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-1370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-1370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌93.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 80W.

Xeon W-1370

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 155W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7351 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,948 vs 23,226).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while EPYC 7351 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7351 better than Xeon W-1370?

Yes. EPYC 7351 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7351 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7351 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1370 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7351 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1370 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-1370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-1370 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 55% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 7351. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370.

Feature	EPYC 7351	Xeon W-1370
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+76%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.9 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	23,226+1%	22,948

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.