EPYC 7352
VS
Core Ultra 5 235HX

EPYC 7352 vs Core Ultra 5 235HX

AMD

EPYC 7352

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 235HX

14 Cores14 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7352

#289
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
MSRP: $2899|Avg: $2699.99
108%
#290
Xeon Gold 5420+
MSRP: $1848|Avg: $1848
105%
#292
Xeon w7-2575X
MSRP: $1689|Avg: $1860
105%
#294
Xeon Gold 6444Y
MSRP: $3622|Avg: N/A
104%
#295
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
MSRP: $2649|Avg: $2782
104%
#296
Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $965
104%
#297
EPYC 7453
MSRP: $1570|Avg: $1253
103%
#298
Xeon Gold 5418Y
MSRP: $1483|Avg: N/A
102%
#299
Xeon w5-3425
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $1189
102%
#300
EPYC 9255
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $1934
102%
#301
EPYC 8324P
MSRP: $1895|Avg: $3598
101%
#302
Xeon Gold 6414U
MSRP: $2296|Avg: $283
101%
#303
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $2495
101%
#304
EPYC 7352
MSRP: $1350|Avg: $725
100%
#305
Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP: $1789|Avg: $2544
99%
#307
Xeon W-3323
MSRP: $949|Avg: $500
98%
#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
97%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
97%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
97%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
96%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
95%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
95%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
95%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
94%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
94%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
93%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 235HX

#8
Core Ultra 5 235HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
95%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
89%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
88%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
84%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 5 235HX (2025) utilizes 3 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7352Core Ultra 5 235HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($725)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7352 (2019) relies on 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7352Core Ultra 5 235HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($725)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 5 235HX

AMD

EPYC 7352

The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235HX

The Core Ultra 5 235HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,122 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235HX offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235HX — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235HX (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Core Ultra 5 235HX's 40,122 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 7352. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 32,000 vs 21,677 (38.5% advantage for the EPYC 7352). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,112 vs 2,600, a 80.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,276 vs 14,000 (63.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235HX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 235HX.

FeatureEPYC 7352Core Ultra 5 235HX
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+71%
14 / 14
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
5.1 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz+26%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+33%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+500%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
PassMark
40,370
40,122
Cinebench R23 Multi
32,000+48%
21,677
Geekbench 6 Single
1,112
2,600+134%
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,276
14,000+92%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235HX — the Core Ultra 5 235HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7352) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 235HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 235HX) — the EPYC 7352 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 5 235HX).

FeatureEPYC 7352Core Ultra 5 235HX
Socket
SP3
FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+2033%
192 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+433%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 235HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 235HX). The Core Ultra 5 235HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (48EU)), while the EPYC 7352 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server, Core Ultra 5 235HX targets Laptop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

FeatureEPYC 7352Core Ultra 5 235HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Graphics (48EU)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-density Computing / Server
Laptop