EPYC 7352 vs Core i9-13900E
EPYC 7352
Core i9-13900E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7352
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($725) | ✅ More affordable ($554) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+31%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($725) | ✅ More affordable ($554) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7352 and Core i9-13900E
EPYC 7352
The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.
Core i9-13900E
The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, matching the Core i9-13900E's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900E (base: 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core i9-13900E uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Core i9-13900E's 40,476 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-13900E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,112 vs 2,606, a 80.4% lead for the Core i9-13900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,276 vs 15,000 (69.3% advantage for the Core i9-13900E). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz+63% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+28% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 40,370 | 40,476 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 32,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,112 | 2,606+134% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,276 | 15,000+106% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-13900E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900E — the Core i9-13900E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7352) vs 2 (Core i9-13900E). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 20 (Core i9-13900E) — the EPYC 7352 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E).
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+540% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900E). The Core i9-13900E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7352 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server, Core i9-13900E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-density Computing / Server | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7352 launched at $1350 MSRP, while the Core i9-13900E debuted at $554. At current prices ($725 vs $554), the Core i9-13900E is $171 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 55.7 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900E — making the Core i9-13900E the 27% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core i9-13900E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1350 | $554-59% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $725 | $554-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.7 | 73.1+31% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7352 and Core i9-13900E
