EPYC 7352 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
EPYC 7352
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7352
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($725) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,130) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Castle Peak (2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+58%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($725) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,130) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7352 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
EPYC 7352
The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX's 39,929 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7352. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 40,370+1% | 39,929 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 32,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,112 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,276 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+209715100% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-density Computing / Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7352 launched at $1350 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX debuted at $1149. At current prices ($725 vs $1130), the EPYC 7352 is $405 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 55.7 pts/$ vs 35.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — making the EPYC 7352 the 44.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1350 | $1149-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $725-36% | $1130 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.7+58% | 35.3 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7352 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
