EPYC 7352
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
EPYC 7352 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7352 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7352 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7352
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 280W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($1,350 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($1,149 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,929 vs 40,370).
- ❌80.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX better than EPYC 7352?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7352 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7352
The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX's 39,929 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7352. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 40,370+1% | 39,929 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 32,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,112 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,276 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-density Computing / Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7352 was priced at $1350, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($1350 vs $1149), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX was $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 29.9 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX the 15% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1350 | $1149-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.9 | 34.8+16% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7352 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
