EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8358

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7401

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8358

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8358 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7401

24 / 48

55,280

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8358

32 / 64

54,416

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8358 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8358: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7401

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Costs $3,107 less on MSRP ($1,500 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
✅Delivers 212.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.9 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 250W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8358 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8358

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (54,416 vs 55,280).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($4,607 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
❌61.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7401 better than Xeon Platinum 8358?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8358 is ahead with a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7401 pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. EPYC 7401 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7401 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7401 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7401 comes in $3,107 cheaper on MSRP at $1,500 MSRP versus $4,607 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8358 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 212.0% better value on MSRP (36.9 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8358 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7401 vs Xeon Platinum 8358 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7401

The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.

Xeon Platinum 8358

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7401 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8358 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7401 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401 scores 55,280 against the Xeon Platinum 8358's 54,416 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 7401. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358.

Feature	EPYC 7401	Xeon Platinum 8358
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+33%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	55,280+2%	54,416

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7401 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7401 versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7401) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) — the EPYC 7401 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7401) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358).

Feature	EPYC 7401	Xeon Platinum 8358
Socket	TR4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity	2048	4096+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114; Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7401	Xeon Platinum 8358
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7401 was priced at $1500, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 came in at $4607. On launch pricing ($1500 vs $4607), EPYC 7401 was $3107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7401 delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8358 — making the EPYC 7401 the 102.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7401	Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP	$1500-67%	$4607
Performance per Dollar	36.9+213%	11.8
Release Date	2017	2021

Search EPYC 7401 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8358 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.