EPYC 7402P vs M4 Max (16 cores)

EPYC 7402P vs M4 Max (16 cores) Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7402P

24 / 48

43,759

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

M4 Max (16 cores)

16 / 16

43,985

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7402P vs M4 Max (16 cores) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7402P vs M4 Max (16 cores): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7402P

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 40.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 Max (16 cores) across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 43,985).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,280 MSRP, while M4 Max (16 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4400% higher power demand at 180W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while M4 Max (16 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

M4 Max (16 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 180W, a 176W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple 40-core GPU, while EPYC 7402P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 Max (16 cores) better than EPYC 7402P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7402P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M4 Max (16 cores) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M4 Max (16 cores) is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 Max (16 cores) is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M4 Max (16 cores) is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7402P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. M4 Max (16 cores) comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,280 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7402P is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 Max (16 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7402P vs M4 Max (16 cores) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7402P

The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.

M4 Max (16 cores)

The M4 Max (16 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 43,985 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7402P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the M4 Max (16 cores) offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7402P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (16 cores) — a 29.5% clock advantage for the M4 Max (16 cores) (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The EPYC 7402P is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7402P scores 43,759 against the M4 Max (16 cores)'s 43,985 — a 0.5% lead for the M4 Max (16 cores).

Feature	EPYC 7402P	M4 Max (16 cores)
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 16
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	4.51 GHz+35%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+2%	2.75 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	43,759	43,985
Geekbench 6 Single	—	4,060
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	26,675

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M4 Max (16 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7402P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402P) vs 40 (M4 Max (16 cores)) — the EPYC 7402P offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7402P) and Apple Silicon (M4 Max (16 cores)).

Feature	EPYC 7402P	M4 Max (16 cores)
Socket	SP3	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	Unified Memory
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+3100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+220%	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7402P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P) vs Apple Virtualization (M4 Max (16 cores)). The M4 Max (16 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple 40-core GPU), while the EPYC 7402P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Max (16 cores) targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248; M4 Max (16 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	M4 Max (16 cores)
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	Apple 40-core GPU
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	Apple Virtualization
Target Use	—	Professional Laptop