EPYC 7402P vs Xeon w5-3435X

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon w5-3435X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7402P

24 / 48

43,759

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon w5-3435X

16 / 32

45,086

+3.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon w5-3435X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon w5-3435X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7402P

2019

Why buy it

✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 45 MB).
✅Costs $309 less on MSRP ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.2 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 270W, a 90W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3435X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 45,086).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3435X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-3435X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.4 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($1,589 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 270W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3435X better than EPYC 7402P?

Yes. Xeon w5-3435X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-3435X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 23.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3435X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3435X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7402P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w5-3435X comes in 24.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,589 MSRP versus $1,280 MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7402P is also 20.5% better value on MSRP (34.2 vs 28.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3435X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon w5-3435X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7402P

The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.

Xeon w5-3435X

The Xeon w5-3435X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,086 points. Launch price was $1,589.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7402P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w5-3435X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7402P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-3435X — a 33.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3435X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7402P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon w5-3435X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402P scores 43,759 against the Xeon w5-3435X's 45,086 — a 3% lead for the Xeon w5-3435X. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402P vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3435X.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon w5-3435X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	4.7 GHz+40%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+184%	45 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	43,759	45,086+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3435X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7402P versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3435X — the Xeon w5-3435X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402P) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3435X) — the EPYC 7402P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7402P) and W790 (Xeon w5-3435X).

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon w5-3435X
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-3435X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3435X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Xeon w5-3435X rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon w5-3435X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7402P was priced at $1280, while the Xeon w5-3435X came in at $1589. On launch pricing ($1280 vs $1589), EPYC 7402P was $309 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402P delivers 34.2 pts/$ vs 28.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3435X — making the EPYC 7402P the 18.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP	$1280-19%	$1589
Performance per Dollar	34.2+20%	28.4
Release Date	2019	2023

Search EPYC 7402P on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3435X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.